The end of the play Essay Example for Free

The end of the play EssayBut Alfieri respects Eddie for macrocosm entrusting to lay down his life for what he sees as justice, even if he does not adjudge the backing of law, when he says the truth is holy. Arthur Miller wrote in the NY Times article that Tragedy arises when we are in the presence of a man who has missed accomplishing his joy. But the job must be there, the promise of the rightfulness style of life must be there. Eddie is a tragic character because he will do anything for the truth, or what he sees as the truth. Alfieri later says he allowed himself to be wholly know and for that I will love him more than all of my sensible clients. He prefers Eddie to the more sensible people he has recognise across because he fought for justice. But Eddie isnt sensible enough to separate justice from his own feelings of indignation. His actions are determined mainly by self interest but he doesnt realise this himself and he breaks a grave of honour which binds Red Ho ok together. He betrays Eddie and Marco to the authorities which is extremely dishonourable. After Beatrice tells Catherine about Vinny Bolzano who betrayed his uncle to Immigration. Eddie says you can faster get back a million dollars that was stole than a word that you gave away. Honour is very principal(prenominal) in the Italian-American community of Red Hook and Eddie is desperate for his reputation back at the end, so his end could be seen as his zenith. Eddies motives were not arrant(a)ly good, but himself purely. Alfieri sees it as an attractive aspect of Eddies character that he was not willing to sacrifice his dignity for a easier life even though he is awake of the problems it caused. The play draws to a close with the words And so I mourn him I admit it with a certain alarm Miller makes clear that Eddie is not a selfless hero, he is almost an anti-hero.In the end he loses everything Catherine, his wife, his name. He can only fight Marco to the death. In death he r estores roughly of his lost honour because he doesnt try to escape his fate. This can also be interpreted as Alfieris horror that Eddie destroyed himself and he was unable to stop it. Eddie is holding the knife as it stabs him, so he literally dies by his own hand so his death could also be seen as his nadir. This cerebrate with the part in his introduction at the start about lawyers before him sitting in their offices interview similar cases, sitting there as a powerless as I, and watched it run its bloody course.reinforcing the understanding of inevitably about Eddies downfall. Miller wants the ending of the play to inspire discussion and excuse us to head things we have previously accepted. He says in his definition of tragedy that it brings us knowledge or knowledge as opposed to pathos which just brings us sadness, benignity, on even fear, which just brings us sadness, sympathy or even fear. Without this final lecture the play would just and with those things. Arguably, Alfieris speech is designed to bring us knowledge and enlightenment.On the other hands, Alfieri sounds confused. Miller certainly wants us to discuss the issues raised in his speech but Alfieri is not very persuasive in telling as why feels that something perversely pure calls out to him from Eddies memory. He sounds as if he has out much of an idea why he feels this way despite evidence to the contrary. Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This student compose piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.