Deontological Versus Teleologica Ethical Systems Essay

Deontological Versus Teleologica Ethical Systems - Essay workoutThis is because the helper injected the patient out of straightforward intentions and the overdose could just be a result of error the instructions given or forgetting them. Since the consequences of an action are of less importance, the organisation is deontological. Utilitarianism Unlike ethical formalism, the useful system judges the moral worth of an action basing on its consequences. Therefore, a good action is that which results in the greatest benefits for the greatest number. This system seeks consistency with the belief that human nature seeks to avoid pain season maximising pleasure (Pollock, 2004). Because of this, people should always act ways that yield the greatest good/benefits verses to atrocious for all persons concerned. A notorious thief can be hanged so that the residents of the place can break from it and have peace as well. It is not justifiable to hang a thief but this wrong is outweighed by the positive consequences achieved by all the town residents. The system is therefore teleological. Religion In the phantasmal system, the moral worth of an action is judged in relation to its conformity certain beliefs. These beliefs provide religious ethics that direct and guide on how people should live. The authority of these ethics, particularly among the Christians and the Jews comes from a wilful and a clear-sighted God. For the believers, God is perfect and thus his authority is unquestionable and is not subject to further examination. Therefore, a good action is that which conforms to the will of God. For example, one should not steal even if the food was meant to save a dying(p) person. The similarity between this system and ethical formalism is that the consequences of an action bears little weight and therefore this system is deontological.