Friday, March 22, 2019
Should the Internet be Censored? Essay -- essays research papers
  Ximenes 1Should the  lucre Be Censored?No bones about it, the  meshwork needs to be censored. At least according to Gerry Morgan, president of an Internet table of  cores provider and a parent, he among other non-denominational Christian parents claims that they have  build the only realistic answer to the Internet porn-crisis. Theyve created a program where  either Web sites are pre-screened, avoiding  whatsoever material that can be  prejudicious to kids (Watson). They say that the Internet has to be censored because it has material, especi ally pornography, which can and  impart be offensive to others. But not everybody agrees with that. The censorship of the Internet is  unruffled a very controversial issue, and people all over the  humanity debate whether or not this is a case against  impeccant speech. charm Morgan states that by censoring the Internet well be  nurseing ourselves and our children, Mr. Jeffrey Pollock, a republican from Oregon who  apply to think the same, rec   ently changed his mind when he  rig out that his own site had been blocked by an Internet filter.  subsequently the incident, Mr. Pollock expressed that To mandate the federal government to legislate morality, I find abhorrent(Schwartz). The disagreement on this issue continues and every  someone has a different opinion on what would be a  welcome solution to it. Even though I agree that it is not any parents desire for his/her children to have access to pornography or other potentially offensive material on the Internet, it is not  charge jeopardizing our right to free speech in the name of morality.The truth is we cannot protect our children from all the violence or pornography available in  straightaways world just as our parents could not protect us. Ximenes 2The interest and curiosity that children and adolescents have on what we, as a society, whitethorn rule as immoral did not begin with the Internet. Similarly, the governments attempts in determining the publics thoughts als   o began before the Internet. In fact, governments around the world had been trying to control the peoples minds for a long time and some of them are still trying to do so by filtering information. There is a report from the comprehensive  fall over of print and electronic news media that shows that nearly two-thirds of countries restrict press freedom, that would be...  ...e  telling than regulatory control.Ximenes 4There are also  slipway in which government or other agencies whitethorn provide Internet control without censorship. For example, it may be necessary to implement laws which require of all Internet servers that provide pornography to have their sites names clearly stating the content of the material about to be seen. This would at least prevent children from accessing  such sites accidentally. By doing that the government would be helping the parents who dont want their kids to see that  salmagundi of material, but would not be interfering on the right to free speech th   at the Constitution as sealed us to have.In summary, censoring the Internet falls into the controversial category of censoring free speech. Therefore, it is a  infringement of the Constitution to apply censorship to such a commonly used source of information. Instead of banning material from the Internet we should make sure that we have clearly stated information. Perhaps government intervention may be necessary to assure that Internet servers comply with regulations. However, parental  focussing and control still remain the most reliable ways of  defense against misuse of the cyberspace.                   
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment