Recent Changes to Welfare

When President Bill Clinton reluctantly signed the Personal make and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, he had an base of what the critical responses would be. The wish was to induce a program that would suffer significant goods to the needy and hungery people of our country. However, the response and criticisms are similar to what our president expected, very negative. Mary Jo terror believes the new benefit law poses serious dangers to poor children and families. As assistant depositary for children and families in the Department of Health and charitable services, she supported the administrations efforts to focus the welfare system on deed and to increase secernate flexibility through the waiver process. But in the programme of reviewing state welfare reform proposals, she became concerned that politics and fiscal pressures were energy states into a race to the bottom(Bane). As considerable as the g ray-headed law was in place the federal official government could swan on guaranteed assistance and protections for recipients.

Her fears ab erupt what would risk to poor children when states were no longer required to provide the nonaged assurances and protections we insisted on in waiver demonstrations led her to resign later on President Clinton signed the welfare bill (Bane). The reform takes out national level responsibilities and puts the gold and responsibility into the individual states. A good amount of flexibility is provided, which whitethorn or whitethorn not result in a positive manner. For instance, they fu! nds could be used on the engagement reform and capriole preparation, eon others could find loopholes in the laws, and while their purposes may not be malicious, the money would not genuinely be carrying out the role intended. No longer go out change assistance to dependent children be...If you want to get a amply essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper