The Science of Religion

When I hear almost(predicate) religious fundamentalists talking about scientific creationism, it genuinely confuses me. Most hoi polloi seem to think that perception and godliness are dickens tot everyy different things, come to night and day. Personally I cull to think of them as being one in the same, an antagonistic pair if you will. They truly compliment and enrich separately different rather than annihilate each another(prenominal).         Perhaps the rationalness for this line of confused fantasy is due to the fact that rough-cut people just arent crude(a) to new ideas. For instance, populacey would phrase that religion is much senior(a) than science. That is one way of feeling at things. I elect to think that religion was a form of early science. later all, isnt science trying to explicate the world around us? In essence that is what religion does as well! gallus aspects try to look at the question of why are we point and how did we procure here? both aspects apparently have answers that to the highest full point would say are very different.         This is again where my opinion differs. religious belief say that God created the heavens and the earth. erudition says that the big bang fount is how the universe and everything in it, including the earth, were created. godliness says that on the seventh day, he created man in his own image.

art object science says man was evolved from apes and other primates. So here we are, two opposing mensess of view. This is exactly the point where the fundamentalists mentioned above get hung up on. They have their scripture and it all the way opposes scientific theory. over again I say, it is all a numerate of how you perceive things.         I have success adequatey combine my Christianity with my tactual sensation in science on a simple and utile plane. later on all, the simplest answer is... If you want to get a full essay, roam it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper